In this paper we categorize and analyze existing and future darknets, from both the technical and legal perspectives. We speculate that there will be short-term impediments to the effectiveness of the darknet as a distribution mechanism, but ultimately the darknet-genie will not be put back into the bottle.
The die is cast. We'll see how things turn out. And I wish you luck in your own venture. What's morally reprehensible is that you think you have any right, or beyond that an obligation, to steer technology in such a way as to control others in accordance with your pseudo-moral code.
It seems you've already given up. If you want to understand more about how this all works in the future feel free to message me. Actually, I'm in the process of getting the world's simplest v1 up and running. Please keep talking though -- it means you're not working. Wow, there's a lot of insanity to decode here. Since you speak so long-windedly I hope you extend me the same curtesy. If a new network becomes popular than a company that has the most expertise in the network becomes highly valuable.
Regardless, there are a number of places to make money in a free market. Before I worked for OB1 I was providing such services. I also use Tails and am working on making OB work on it. So what? We support a number of operating systems. I do not care who Brian and Sam worked for before because I understand the code more than they do. You're a dev, like me" You're not my boss. I can talk where I want how I want. If Brian wants me to speak differently he'll let me know.
I'm a developer, but it doesn't sound like we're anything a like. I've expressed that as a protocol there's no reasonable way to stop it but if somebody wants to try feel free. Maybe Google won't be the dominate search engine long term. What about it? If people want help they can get it elsewhere. But if the technology is inevitable, then it's worth trying.
If you do then I welcome the increased availability of free markets. If you have any real concerns other than being peoples' nanny please correct me. If you would just own it, and admit that this is what you're doing, then it would be different. A day off.
OB is not spending any resources for me to browse HN on the weekend and respond to dumbass baseless claims like you have. Personally we are far from destitute, and generally a real free market will happen. There's no need for luck. He is referring to the parent post, plainly stating that your team has agency ties. Not if you're as low level as you say you are, or you may be out of a job very soon; you aren't painting a very good picture of your company.
On that note, if you aren't at a high level, you may not have all the info, and are unqualified to have this discussion. Yes, with shifty answers. You said the two founders lived in Virginia and I correctly stated that there are 3 founders and only one lives there.
Sam having lived there before in no way affects our project. You're being ridiculous. You're original comment even admitted that you may be being ridiculous but still you persist. If you are really going to work on a totally open and free market that's wonderful. I don't care if OB loses I only care that some free marketplace wins. And I believe it will. Your awful attitude and assumptions of ill will won't serve you well though. And can you please clarify, are you concerned about us being a free market or about "spooks" knowing what bad people are up to?
Update: Sam has been informed that his website is out of date and he'll update it. What an extremely hostile and accusatory post. Mods, is this the kind of behavior we want here? Sure, what's your email? EDIT: This is doable though. There are endless stories of new startups running circles around established competitors. I don't know if that will happen, but we should explore the possibility.
How hard can it be to set this up in a nice packaged experience? It's a lot of work, but it's not difficult work. TBH I'm not too sure something like that could even work. I remember logging into bitcoin-otc one day and hearing about what arbatrage did, that was when I lost faith in these reputation based markets.
Even stuff like amazons struggles with this. What do you see as some of the major problems? It's hard to overstate how easy it is to dismiss ideas like this, though.
I vividly remember my friend wanting to start a Bitcoin exchange in or so. He was like we can do it, people will eventually be transacting in BTC, this is a huge opportunity. Isn't that finance? That's regulation hell, better not even try.
Funny how things turn out. Before that he was talking about neutal nets when we were teenagers, and I thought he was crazy. AI was just a fad that died in the 80's. This particular idea seems of the same class, and I'm determined not to make the same mistake three times. But if there are hard issues with it, it's best to know. So what did you have in mind? I agree version 1 isn't great. We're alpha testing version 2 and so far it's being received a lot better.
I find the possibility of an untraceable assassination market much more worrying. There are currently, would-be-customers of such a service who lack the necessarily contacts, and there are plenty of would-be-contract-killers who would take such a "gig".
A possible assassination market that is untraceable might facilitate trade between these two sets of entities which is of course a good thing, because all trade is good. Any ideas on how the internet could be changed to not allow that? The internet is designed to make any such attempts impossible, up to the scale of a nuclear assault. Luckily, though, I definitely agree.
I'm glad we're such a hot button topic. When I left my previous job to do what I cared most about I'd have never thought people would care as much as you do. I'll make my first sale on our new version dedicated to you. ImSkeptical on Aug 21, parent prev next [—].
From what I understand, its because they were all run by amateurs who made opsec or IT mistakes. What I think is scary is that sooner or later, someone with the cash to hire serious professionals, like a Russian criminal gang, is going to set up a darknet marketplace that can't be cracked. CM30 on Aug 21, root parent next [—].
Honestly, I'm kind of surprised that so many darknet markets turned out to be run by amateur technies in the US or Western Europe rather than actual criminal gangs.
There is always the possibility that the amateur techies were fall guys, I agree that it is odd that no major market had significant ties. That is actually a good point. Who's to say all these site 'owners' actually are the people funding or backing up the project?
Maybe they already are getting help from established criminal gangs and organisations. It's not impossible. Fixed that for you. In the last … Expand. Characterization of community based-P2P systems and implications for traffic localization. Peer-to-Peer Netw. View 1 excerpt, cites background. The design and implementation of a security and containment platform for peer-to-peer media distribution.
Highly Influenced. View 3 excerpts, cites methods and background. Splash: Data synchronization in unmanaged, untrusted peer-to-peer networks. Peer-to-peer networks rely on gossip algorithms to spread information about the peer activity and the network status.
State-of-the-art gossip algorithms are not sufficient to spread the information … Expand. P2P commercial digital content exchange. Freenet is a distributed, Internet-wide peer-to-peer overlay network designed to allow anonymized and censorship resistant publication and distribution of information. The system functions as a … Expand. This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access. Microsoft Corporation. Personalised recommendations. Cite chapter How to cite?
ENW EndNote.
0コメント