Login Register. Search Search TheFreeSite. Then please link to us! In this section, we offer a roundup of the Web's top resources for WAV files. If you're looking for sounds in other formats go to TheFreeSite. Be sure to also check out the rest of TheFreeSite. This popular site serves up over 6, sound files and includes a search engine. WAV categories here include cinema, TV, sound effects, computer system events, politics, humor and more.
The site includes a search engine to help you locate the sound clips you're looking for. Plenty of sound files from cinema, TV and even commercials for your downloading pleasure. Past selections are archived alphabetically.
A quality, well-done site that's among the most popular of its kind. For the record, 15 minutes of bit If your audio takes less than 30 MB, it's lossy, at which point you don't care about bit depth or sample rate, you just care about the bit rate and what the compression algorithm is. It's kbps AAC like everything on YouTube, which is actually pretty bad and anyone can easily hear the difference between that and lossless quality if you do a direct comparison and I can actually tell just from listening to songs on YouTube without having the comparison available that the quality is audibly worse than lossless.
But other than that, it's not true. Many people who don't have a lot of experience in listening to audio might listen to a low quality file and not notice that it's low quality unless they directly compare it with a higher quality file. Many people who use really crappy equipment won't be able to tell the difference even when comparing the two files because their equipment doesn't reproduce the high frequencies accurately anyway. The same is true if you have significant hearing damage and your ears can't hear the high frequencies.
If you really want to be sure, check the file with a frequency analyzer — it's fine if the high frequencies look pretty natural, and it's not if there's a clear cut-off point at, say, 12 kHz or 16 kHz. If there's a clear cut-off point but it's higher than 16 k, it's less than ideal but people can live with it. There was a more in-depth guide about using frequency analysis to confirm the quality of an audio file, someone else posted it on Iwara some time ago, IIRC it was pretty accurate.
And when you rip it off for your own video, it is not going to sound the same unless you use a lossless audio codec when rendering your video.
For the record, mp4 doesn't support any lossless audio codecs so as long as you use mp4, the quality gets worse for sure. And when you upload your video and the audio gets re-encoded by the streaming service, the quality gets worse again. I think Iwara doesn't do that for the "Source" quality as long as your file meets the requirements, but YouTube certainly does. I cant tell a difference and my videos doesnt ment to be still avaible in for the future D;. That's not true either.
Yes, that video will sound the same in 20 years wtf are you even talking about. But if I downloaded that video, re-encoded it and uploaded it again today, it would sound even shittier than it already does. If you don't care that your videos sound horrible, then that's your problem and I'm not particularly interested in convincing you to start caring about it.
But stop giving people advice when you don't have any idea what you're talking about. I'm not a speaker salesman, As I said, I can use the standard Samsung earphones and your video still sounds like shit on those.
A 5 MB mp3 is fine as long as the song is no longer than and it's being encoded directly into mp3 from the lossless source material. If you're encoding it from an mp3 that was encoded from an AAC that was encoded from an AAC that was encoded from an AAC that was encoded from a high quality mp3 that was encoded from the original CD quality file a very realistic scenario , it'll end up sounding like your video.
Earphones, not speakers. I can't hear it on a smart phone speaker, but I sure can hear it on the earphones that come with one.
The degradation of sound quality in your video is just as obvious with those as it is with the Samsung earphones. Guthix i have aknowledged awaclus "point" allrdy in my first reply, the following conversation was more about how much quality lose is tolerated. Noted that I could not download the original song release from NicoNico at that time, because of a NicoNico update that my video grabbers had not yet had been updated to.
SPEK is pure gold for deciding the best possible sound source file. Then I'll slide the new soundtrack in place, adjusting in 0. I never make an upload public at any video site, without checking its private download with SPEK first. Your softwares might reduce the sound quality when you least expect it, and SPEK will helpfully reveal it. Appearantly the song creator did a non-optimal NicoNico upload of the song, and the motion creator later on got the original soundtrack by E-mail from the song creator?
Where to download WAV files? Mister Orzo. WAV files containing what? Voices, music, sound effects? Ley Line Walker.
0コメント